Play the game.
I've been fighting a chess bot named "Li," who is ostensibly from Taiwan. Rated at 2000, I would say that it's an accurate statement that this level of play is quite challenging for me. I have now beaten Li once out of 17 games. One of those 17 games was a draw, so I guess I have a record of not losing 11.76% of the time. Those aren't great odds. Below is the winning game against Li. Real chess players will see this is an UGLY win, not elegant at all. But a win's a win, right? At this point in the experience, the only way that I can beat a bot is to make as few mistakes as possible and be ready when it does. Clearly these are programmed into the algorithm so that they make for a more human-like competitor. On Chess.com, these are considered Advanced competitors. I have "Charles," "Fatima," "Manuel," and "Oscar" before I reach into the master bot territory. My strategy, though I don't know smart it is, is to...